Crime and Population
Police Coverage in Las Vegas
"Poverty is the parent of revolution and crime."
— Aristotle

Background

Over the last century, Las Vegas and the greater Clark County Nevada, has experienced a significant population growth. Home to less than 5,000 people in 1920, there were nearly 2.5 million residents by 2020, with roughly 25% arriving in the last decade alone. Such rapid growth places strain on a communities essential infrastructure, from housing, utilities, and schools, to healthcare, and emergency response facilities.

This study examines the current police infrastructure to determine if the Las Vegas Metro Police Department (LVMPD) is able to adequately serve the existing population and identifies areas for improvement to better serve the community in the future

Data & Tools

Police response time windows - 5 and 10 minutes intervals

Process

To validate the visibility claims from the summit of Mount Constitution, a systematic GIS-based workflow was employed:

  1. Population Analysis

    To understand crime potential, key socio-economic indicators were analyzed across census tracts within Clark County:

    • Population Density: Higher population density correlates with increased “targets of opportunity.”
      Data Field: B01001e1 (Total Population)
      Calculation: Total Population ÷ Tract Area (mi²)
    • Poverty Levels: Greater poverty rates correlate with increased crime due to financial need.
      Data Fields: B17001e1 (Total Population) and B17001e2 (Population Below Poverty Level)
      Calculation: Population Below Poverty Level ÷ Total Population
    • Educational Attainment: Lower education levels may contribute to higher crime rates.
      Data Fields: B15003e1 (Population Over 25) and B15003e2–B15003e16 (Population Without High School Diploma)
      Calculation: Population Without Diploma ÷ Population Over 25
  2. Analysis of Police Data

    Two aspects of police data were evaluated:

    • Response Coverage: Using ArcGIS Network Analysis, drive-time zones (5, 10, and 15 minutes) were generated around existing police stations to assess their coverage areas.
    • Service Demand: LVMPD call data for 2022 was spatially joined with census tracts, and monthly averages of calls per tract were calculated to identify high-demand areas.
  3. Compiling Results

    In order to better compare each census tract, each indicator was ranked on a 1-5 scale, with lower numbers suggesting a higher crime potential.

    Population Density Poverty Without Education Service Calls Station Distance
    Amount Rank Amount Rank Amount Rank Amount Rank Amount Rank
    <= 2,500 5 <= 7.5% 5 <= 7% 5 <= 21 5 <= 5 5
    <= 5,000 5 <= 13% 5 <= 14% 5 <= 59 5 - -
    <= 10,000 3 <= 20% 3 <= 24% 3 <= 120 3 <= 10 3
    <= 15,000 2 <= 29% 2 <= 36% 2 <= 372 2 - -
    > 15,000 1 > 29% 1 > 36% 1 > 372 1 >= 10 1
    Metric Rank5 Rank4 Rank3 Rank2 Rank1
    Population Density <= 2,500 <= 5,000 <= 10,000 <= 15,000 > 15,000
    Poverty <= 7.5% <= 13% <= 20% <= 29% > 29%
    Without Education <= 7% <= 14% <= 24% <= 36% > 36%
    Service Calls <= 21 <= 59 <= 120 <= 372 > 372
    Station Distance <= 5 - <= 10 - > 10


    These indicators were then assigned a weight and added together to create a consolidated score for each census tract.

    • Population Density - 10%
    • Poverty Levels - 15%
    • Educational Attainment - 20%
    • High Crime Areas - 25%
    • Distance from Stations - 30%

Key Results

Although it's not inclusive of every factor that can lead to why some areas see more crime than others, and despite only looking at a singular 30-day period of LVMPD calls for service, there is enough data available to make some determinations.

  1. Gaps in Coverage Area

    Overlaying the driving times on top of the weighted results shows a handful of census tract areas that have a high potential for crime, partially due to how far away they are from existing stations.

  2. New Station Proposals

    By comparing the gaps in the LVMPD coverage area and the weighted results, there are 3 locations that are prime for the addition of additional police stations.

    • Western Station
    • Eastern Station
    • Northwestern Station

Future Revisions

It's always a good idea to look back over a project and think about what could be done differently. In this project, I came up with two things that could be redone if I were to redo this again.

  1. Longer Service History

    A 30-day history of police dispatches is a great snapshot in time, but ignores seasonal variations. Instead, a 12-month lookback would include the changes brought about by fluctuations in tourism, as well as accounting for the summer days where temperatures are deep into the triple digits and winter nights where they dip below freezing.

  2. Better Understanding of What Leads to Crime

    The three socio-economic factors used (population density, educational attainment, and poverty level) are all assumed to be factors that lead to crime. No research was conducted to validate that claim, or to identify what other factors might correlate more. While it won't change the techniques used, having a more accurate understanding of the socio-economic elements behind crime could lead to more accurate results.